Life after google pdf download

The library card you previously added can't be used to complete this action. Please add your card again, or add a different card. If you receive an error message, please contact your library for help. Error loading page. Try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, there may be a network issue, and you can use our self test page to see what's preventing the page from loading.

Learn more about possible network issues or contact support for more help. National Library Board Singapore. Search Search Search Browse menu. His beliefs may wander into idealistic territory when he insists a system upholding the creative potential of humanity will inevitably win out. The rise of big data shows that human nature also has a great proclivity for the short term, rather than realizing its full potential over the long term.

Our true currency, and what we must value the most, is our relationship to time itself. View all 5 comments. Nov 07, David Rubenstein rated it liked it Shelves: economics. Not a memorable book. It seems like a self-promotional book for the author's investment fund. I was looking for a good explanation of blockchain technology. It's not here. Shelves: philosophy , technology. He writes coherently and thoughtfully about a rich variety of topics, and a common theme running through much of his thought over the last 30 years is an optim [Check out my podcast interview with George Gilder: www.

In the early 90s, for example, Gilder foresaw and wrote about the impending broadband revolution and the smartphone era there's even evidence to suggest that he directly influenced Steve Jobs and the iPhone.

Undergirding his recent writings on technology is the science and philosophy of a concept known as Information Theory. Gilder spends a lot of time teaching the fundamentals of the theory and unpacking its implications in his book Knowledge and Power: The Information Theory of Capitalism and How it is Revolutionizing our World. Explaining information theory is beyond my scope here, and I certainly do not understand it fully definitely not enough to write confidently about it.

But I'm utterly fascinated by the way it actively informs Gilder's thinking on so many different topics—from his opposition to insider trading laws, to his defense of entrepreneurship as the lifeblood of economic activity, to his framing of government intervention in the interest rate market in terms of time and knowledge, and his full-throated defense of capitalism.

His most recent application of information theory touches on Google's ecosystem and its philosophy of humanity, on blockchain and decentralization, on rapid innovative increases in low-power computing capabilities, and on cryptocurrencies. All Your Data Belong to Us Gilder starts Life After Google by utterly demolishing the premises that Google's model is built upon, and describing how dangerous it is to society.

To Google, you and I are not the customer; in fact, we are the product. They sell our information to advertisers and also use it to develop and perfect their algorithms. And on. But there are major consequences to this model. For one, there is no market incentive to provide security of your data. After all, you aren't a paying customer, and Google can get away with token efforts at protecting you.

To make matters worse, a centralized model means all the important data is in one place—a glorious gift for hackers and data miners. In the early stages of the Internet, data centralization wasn't feasible.

Processor speeds and the costs of memory were prohibitive. But Google and the rest of Silicon Valley drove the miraculous innovation that brought us exponentially faster, smaller, and cheaper computers. This made it possible for them to become efficient repositories of our data. This model—and the risk involved—is not unique to Google. Just consider all the data breaches in recent years, and the hundreds of millions of users who saw their information exposed. This is a direct result of a centralized model of data storage.

You don't really own your data at all these companies—financial institutions, utilities, retail merchants, healthcare providers, insurance companies, personal cloud storage DropBox, OneDrive, Evernote , etc. Nor do you have any ability to keep it safe. A single successful hack can potentially expose millions of customers' worth of data. To change the metaphor, as long as the gold is sitting in the vault, the bank robbers will keep finding ways of getting in.

It's an inherent problem and an enormous moral hazard, and it doesn't serve our interests. The entire model is flawed. Gilder proposes an answer to this problem, and we'll get to that. But first we need to discuss the philosophical roots of Google's worldview. They assume that eventually artificial intelligence AI will surpass us. But they cannot account for human consciousness with only mathematics and algorithms.

In Google's worldview, the Singularity is real—the inevitable moment when artificial intelligence overtakes that of man. Citing a handful of German scientists, mathematicians and philosophers from the 19th and 20th centuries, Gilder argues that information theory has definitively disproved this concept, shown it to be inherently self-contradictory. In one sense it's a warmed-over, scientific cousin of classic Marxism. The algorithmic eschaton renders obsolete not only human labor but the human mind as well.

Is time for a new information architecture for a globally distributed economy. Fortunately, it is on its way. But AI doesn't have true intelligence, and it can never exhibit genuine creativity—only humans can do that. AI is just an algorithm. An incredibly sophisticated algorithm that grows beyond the understanding of its creators, yes, but ultimately it is still simply following rules, however complex.

Very simply, it's the new frontier being developed by young and emerging protocols of data decentralization, currency, info privacy and security—all built upon peer-to-peer, distributed ledgers known as the blockchain. Imagine a money system where governments are incapable of printing their way out of debt, or of manipulating interest rates to serve the interests of their corporate cronies or advance an imperialist foreign policy.

Imagine contracts—business deals, land titles, and more—that are enforced automatically by software protocols that nobody can interfere with.

Imagine being able to pay anyone around the world instantly with total security, privacy, freedom, and without usurious transaction fees. Imagine being able to deliver micropayments to content providers on the internet rather than be force-fed ads that are either irrelevant to you or so targeted that they are creepy.

Imagine having total control over your data—financial info, transaction history, personal medical records, browsing history, personal preferences and hobbies, etc. In a world of centralized data, you get none of these things. You are the product being marketed, and your information is not protected. But the cryptocosm can deliver us from this model and deliver to us these benefits of security, privacy and control But how? The potential of the cryptocosm is rooted in separate innovations in hardware and software.

Although Google played a key role in fostering the hardware innovations that were prerequisites to developing their dominance in centralizing and delivering data, and although their insatiable need for better and faster tech is fueling the next round of advances today, the irony is that those same innovations are fueling parallel advances in cryptographic decentralization based on the blockchain.

The computational power available in ever-smaller and low-power devices—like smartphones—allows cheaper and faster data processing than ever before, all without the need for centralized servers. For example, facial recognition software is built upon extremely complex algorithms that initially required a stack of servers to accomplish. No longer. A hand-held device can manage it instantly and locally. It's the same story with rendering video. The possibilities are endless. Google is sowing the seeds of its own destruction.

This innovation is always needed. The question is who has the incentive to lead the charge. In the post-blockchain world, the model gets flipped and there is direct incentive [for many teams outside the giant companies] to work on the hard problems of protocol and infrastructure innovation. This is a major shift. Gilder provides many examples. Brendan Eich, creator of the most widely used programming language in the world JavaScript and former head of Mozilla, has been innovating on his latest venture—the Brave browser.

It's a brilliant approach to reasserting one's autonomy and privacy on the internet, and I hope it takes off. I believe the future of our money will definitely be a cryptocurrency. The question is, do you want a cryptocurrency that is managed, overseen, controlled, and gate-kept by a government, or one that is decentralized, secure, private, outside the control of a state, and impossible to inflate or manipulate?

Gilder writes that the cryptocurrency is building a new trust, ID, and transactions later for the Internet. Better than cash, it offers exchanges that conceal personal information but also allow complete proof of compliance where necessary. Not only can you exchange anonymously, you can prove your record of behavior if a government makes untrue charges or a business makes spurious claims. This combination of security and attestation makes cryptocurrencies a fundamental improvement on existing moneys—a remedy for the monetary turbulence of our time.

But this is by far the most active and innovative sector of the tech economy right now, with billions being invested. Indeed, crypto startups have all but replaced the standard IPO this is partly because of draconian regulations imposed after the financial crisis that effectively killed IPOs and are doing immense damage to entrepreneurship in the United States. Blockchain The blockchain which cryptocurrencies are built upon but is NOT the same thing poses some really amazing opportunities for taking back control over your personal and private data in the Internet age, from smart contracts to land titles.

Just about anything that requires security and integrity can move to a decentralized model that will ultimately be safer and more reliable for end-users. As Gilder is fond of saying, every failed venture is an opportunity to learn, to gain clarifying signals information from the market economy. The cryptocosm can mobilize computer power in volumes that dwarf even the data centers of the leviathans. As a free market guy, he naturally opposes the draconian attempts to regulate internet service providers, for reasons both philosophical it's immoral and practical it's counterproductive.

As the world's data continues to accumulate, and the ever-growing need for bandwidth and wireless coverage continues, the fate of the cryptocosm depends on the nascent 5G network. The gains in speed and coverage that 5G promises are so vast that they make net neutrality concerns all but obsolete—if the government doesn't smother the spread of the technology through regulation.

If bandwidth is scarce, it will have to be allocated preferentially, regardless of the laws. But those regulations threaten to kill the very innovations that will allow their heavy data usage to continue into the future. The good news for us is that Google, in attempting to provide for its future, will actually sow the seeds of its own destruction.

Gilder gives us many good reasons that life after Google will arrive soon, and what a better future it will be. Jun 30, Jesse rated it it was amazing Shelves: economics , big-tech , theology , science , philosophy. Key work that unpacks the worldview behind Google, Facebook, and other tech companies. Nothing is free. If you are not paying for it, then you are the product.

The big tech companies are running on a Darwinian social conditioning model. If you understand that, then you understand everything else. The end goal for these companies is Artificial Intelligence.

But these tech companies will not get there because the human mind is different than the human brain. This article makes a chief and educated contribution to an issue that's under-researched within the united kingdom — the suicide of these who paintings within the united kingdom police provider — via providing an research of united kingdom case stories of officials and employees who've both accomplished suicide or skilled suicide ideation, and relating the most likely leading suicide precipitators in those events.

Suffering to omit a crumbling marriage, forty-year-old Anna Lucia Lottol involves Venice to go to an previous friend—but rather than discovering solace, she is dragged into the police station and accused of murdering a money-laundering count number with whom she had a short affair. Now comes new crisis—zombie swarms and new Infected. The doomsday world is out of control. Google BooksPart bltadwin. The first edition of the novel was published in , and was written by Anna Todd.